AML policy template price: AML Compliance Vendor Pricing

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

6 of the 20 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 14 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 3 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 91 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): the price of ACTUALLY HAVING the policy, which nobody assembles: the median, minimum and maximum published price for each thing the policy commits the firm to - the template document itself, an identity check, an AML screen, ongoing monitoring, a travel-rule message - with the count and share of vendors that publish a number at all versus quote-only, the unit each one prices in (per verification, per screened entity, per month, per seat) normalised so the numbers can be compared, the entry price a one-person VASP can actually reach, and repriced-since the previous read

91 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.